1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. alt.games.fallout

  • VATS vs FO 1 or 2

    From tick@Axe@you.com to alt.games.fallout on Friday, January 30, 2009 12:35:52
    From Newsgroup: alt.games.fallout

    i personally dont think they could have done a better job making a real
    time game turn based. action points and all. i tried the latest oblivion,
    i couldnt get into it. tho i absolutly love fallout games. never played
    the brotherhood of steel, i heard it sucked.
    i do also think they did a great job letting you complete quests out of
    order. in fallout 1 and 2 you could ruin the game.
    and these graffics are insane!

    back ot VATS.

    in FO 1 and 2, u would basically stand in 1 place and shoot. in this one
    you can move over behind a tree or rock ect ect ect. i have learned not to stand behind cars. didnt think they could explode 200 years after they
    were destroyed. and does the commando perc really help?
    --- Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113
  • From Gamester@gamestersgames@aol.com to alt.games.fallout on Sunday, February 01, 2009 09:47:17
    From Newsgroup: alt.games.fallout

    On Jan 30, 4:35�am, tick <A...@you.com> wrote:
    �and does the commando perc really help?
    It doesnt make much of a difference on its own but when combined with concentrated fire, sniper, finess and the other vats perks it makes
    for very good effect.
    --- Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 NewsLink 1.113